Abstract

The stochastic simulation algorithm commonly known as Gillespie’s algorithm (originally derived for modelling well-mixed systems of chemical reactions) is now used ubiquitously in the modelling of biological processes in which stochastic effects play an important role. In well-mixed scenarios at the sub-cellular level it is often reasonable to assume that times between successive reaction/interaction events are exponentially distributed and can be appropriately modelled as a Markov process and hence simulated by the Gillespie algorithm. However, Gillespie’s algorithm is routinely applied to model biological systems for which it was never intended. In particular, processes in which cell proliferation is important (e.g. embryonic development, cancer formation) should not be simulated naively using the Gillespie algorithm since the history-dependent nature of the cell cycle breaks the Markov process. The variance in experimentally measured cell cycle times is far less than in an exponential cell cycle time distribution with the same mean.Here we suggest a method of modelling the cell cycle that restores the memoryless property to the system and is therefore consistent with simulation via the Gillespie algorithm. By breaking the cell cycle into a number of independent exponentially distributed stages, we can restore the Markov property at the same time as more accurately approximating the appropriate cell cycle time distributions. The consequences of our revised mathematical model are explored analytically as far as possible. We demonstrate the importance of employing the correct cell cycle time distribution by recapitulating the results from two models incorporating cellular proliferation (one spatial and one non-spatial) and demonstrating that changing the cell cycle time distribution makes quantitative and qualitative differences to the outcome of the models. Our adaptation will allow modellers and experimentalists alike to appropriately represent cellular proliferation—vital to the accurate modelling of many biological processes—whilst still being able to take advantage of the power and efficiency of the popular Gillespie algorithm.

Highlights

  • In a well-mixed solution of chemicals undergoing reactions, non-reactive collisions occur far more often than reactive collisions allowing us to neglect the fast dynamics of motion

  • We demonstrate the importance of employing the correct cell cycle time distribution by recapitulating the results from two models incorporating cellular proliferation and demonstrating that changing the cell cycle time distribution makes quantitative and qualitative differences to the outcome of the models

  • We demonstrate later in this paper that using the correct cell cycle time distributions (CCTDs) could alter their results leading to different suggested treatment strategies

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In a well-mixed solution of chemicals undergoing reactions, non-reactive collisions occur far more often than reactive collisions allowing us to neglect the fast dynamics of motion. As special cases of the hypoexponential distributions, these distributions have the significant advantage that they can be simulated using the ubiquitous Gillespie stochastic simulation algorithm This will allow for the appropriate representation of CCTDs in stochastic models of cell populations, in contrast to the inappropriate exponentially distributed times which are commonly used (Baar et al 2016; Castellanos-Moreno et al 2014; Ryser et al 2016; Figueredo et al 2014; Turner et al 2009; Mort et al 2016; Zaider and Minerbo 2000). These two choices (Erlang and exponentially modified Erlang distributions) are not the only non-monotone distributions which could be used to appropriately represent the cell cycle They are the general, non-monotone, hypoexponential distributions with the fewest number of parameters (two for Erlang and three for exponentially modified Erlang).

Multi-stage Model of the Cell Cycle
Identical Rates of Progression
Analysis of the CCDT with Equal Rates of Progression
Cells are Not Distributed Proportional to Stage Length
The Exponentially Modified Erlang Distribution
Illustrative Examples
Cancer Stem Cell Maintenance
Growth-to-Confluence Assays
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call