Abstract

BackgroundSpermatozoa have a remarkable epigenome in line with their degree of specialization, their unique nature and different requirements for successful fertilization. Accordingly, perturbations in the establishment of DNA methylation patterns during male germ cell differentiation have been associated with infertility in several species. While bull semen is widely used in artificial insemination, the literature describing DNA methylation in bull spermatozoa is still scarce. The purpose of this study was therefore to characterize the bull sperm methylome relative to both bovine somatic cells and the sperm of other mammals through a multiscale analysis.ResultsThe quantification of DNA methylation at CCGG sites using luminometric methylation assay (LUMA) highlighted the undermethylation of bull sperm compared to the sperm of rams, stallions, mice, goats and men. Total blood cells displayed a similarly high level of methylation in bulls and rams, suggesting that undermethylation of the bovine genome was specific to sperm. Annotation of CCGG sites in different species revealed no striking bias in the distribution of genome features targeted by LUMA that could explain undermethylation of bull sperm. To map DNA methylation at a genome-wide scale, bull sperm was compared with bovine liver, fibroblasts and monocytes using reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) and immunoprecipitation of methylated DNA followed by microarray hybridization (MeDIP-chip). These two methods exhibited differences in terms of genome coverage, and consistently, two independent sets of sequences differentially methylated in sperm and somatic cells were identified for RRBS and MeDIP-chip. Remarkably, in the two sets most of the differentially methylated sequences were hypomethylated in sperm. In agreement with previous studies in other species, the sequences that were specifically hypomethylated in bull sperm targeted processes relevant to the germline differentiation program (piRNA metabolism, meiosis, spermatogenesis) and sperm functions (cell adhesion, fertilization), as well as satellites and rDNA repeats.ConclusionsThese results highlight the undermethylation of bull spermatozoa when compared with both bovine somatic cells and the sperm of other mammals, and raise questions regarding the dynamics of DNA methylation in bovine male germline. Whether sperm undermethylation has potential interactions with structural variation in the cattle genome may deserve further attention.

Highlights

  • Spermatozoa have a remarkable epigenome in line with their degree of specialization, their unique nature and different requirements for successful fertilization

  • Global DNA methylation level is low in bull sperm We first assessed the global level of DNA methylation in bull sperm relative to somatic cells (PBMCs) using luminometric methylation assay (LUMA) [33, 34] on a large sample size

  • Because the sperm samples were collected from Holstein, Montbéliarde, Normande and Belgian White Blue bulls, we investigated the effect of the breed on global sperm DNA methylation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Spermatozoa have a remarkable epigenome in line with their degree of specialization, their unique nature and different requirements for successful fertilization. Sperm unique morphology and functions result from a long differentiation process that requires dynamic epigenetic reprogramming of the genome [1], which starts with the global erasure and reestablishment of DNA methylation marks in fetal and post-natal germ cells [2] and continues throughout adulthood. Domestication, the creation of highly specialized breeds and decades of genetic improvement have shaped the bovine genome [29] This undoubtedly has had a profound impact on the methylome, since DNA methylation is directly affected by the CpG content of the genome and its alteration by DNA polymorphism [30]. Hypo-DMCs b c important to spermatogenesis (which is the differentiation process that eventually leads to the mature sperm we analyzed), and to genes involved in cell communication, signaling and migration that may be essential to both sperm functions and post-fertilization steps.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call