A multi-model evaluation of probabilistic streamflow predictions via residual error modelling

Abstract

Probabilistic streamflow predictions are valuable tools for predictive uncertainty estimation, hydrologic risk management, and support for decision-making in water resources. Usually, predictive uncertainty quantification is developed and assessed using only a single hydrological model, making it difficult to generalize to other model configurations. To tackle this issue, we assess changes in the model performance ranking of diverse streamflow models by applying a residual error model post-processing approach to multiple basins and multiple models. This assessment employed 141 basins from the Great Lakes watershed covering the USA and Canada, and 13 diverse streamflow models, which are evaluated using deterministic and probabilistic performance metrics. As the first study to implement probabilistic methods to diverse streamflow models applied to a multitude of basins, the analysis here examines the dependence of probabilistic streamflow estimation quality on model quality. Our findings show that streamflow model choice influences the robustness of probabilistic predictions. It was found that moving from deterministic to probabilistic predictions using a post-processing approach does not change the streamflow model performance ranking for the best and worst deterministic models, but models of intermediate rank in deterministic evaluation do not have consistent ranking when evaluated in probabilistic mode. Post-processing residual errors of long short-term memory (LSTM) network models are consistently the best-performing model in terms of deterministic and probabilistic metrics. This study highlights the significance of combining deterministic streamflow model predictions with residual error models for improving the quality and increasing the value of hydrological predictions, quantifying uncertainty, and facilitating decision-making in operational water management. It also clarifies the degree to which probabilistic predictions depend upon good model performance and can compensate for poor model performance.