Abstract
The location decision of the emergency rescue center, as a necessary link in the early stage to ensure the smooth development of emergency management, has become increasingly important. This paper analyzes the research theories and methods of location problem at home and abroad. By considering the decision-making psychological behavior of decision-makers, based on the idea of cumulative prospect theory, combined with the Pythagorean fuzzy multi-attribute evaluation method, this paper proposes a Pythagorean fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making evaluation method based on improved cumulative prospect theory. This method is to sort the results of each decision-making scheme by calculating the comprehensive cumulative prospect value. Based on the utility curve improved cumulative prospect theory, the research first depicts the psychological behavior characteristics of various decision-making groups under different risk preferences, and then designs a distance measurement method based on the geometric center of Pythagorean fuzzy right triangle. The main core of the distance measurement method is to convert Pythagorean fuzzy numbers into Pythagorean fuzzy right triangles. In the aspect of attribute weight assignment, a subjective and objective weighting method based on the combination of value function and deviation method of improved cumulative prospect theory is proposed. Finally, the Pythagorean fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making method based on the improved cumulative prospect theory is realized through the selection of reference objects, the calculation of value function value, weight function value and cumulative prospect value. This study takes the site selection of emergency rescue center in the construction period of Ya’an Linzhi Section of Sichuan Tibet Railway in China as an example, and proposes 10 emergency rescue centers as alternatives. Considering the different preferences of decision-makers, the improved decision-making method proposed in this paper is used to obtain the most optimal site selection scheme under different decision-making preferences.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.