Abstract

The process of liberalization of international trade and of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) has constituted a broadly accepted trend during the last few decades and FDI inflows have expanded constantly since the end of the 1980’s. However, signs of a certain crisis of the positive and one-way attitude towards international trade and FDI exist nowadays. The increase in the flux of FDI coming from developing and emerging countries to developed economies, the sudden relevance of foreign sovereign investors, the changing environment for national security or the quest to protect technologies and sectors of the economy considered vital for the host country, its sovereignty and competitiveness are creating a new reality that impacts on both, the global fluxes of FDI and its regulation. Tension exists between the commitment towards freedom of FDI and the right of the state to ensure that certain legitimate public interests and goals can be fully implemented. This may lead to the protection of certain strategic sectors of the economy of the country or flagship firms from foreign investment on national security or related grounds. The current revision of the great paradigms on which FDI, and its legal framework, stand is ascertainable in the growing recourse by states to the development of some measures devoted to prevent the entrance of FDI in the country under certain circumstances.

Highlights

  • Agencies (WAIPA) —the Association of Investment Promotion Agencies which was established in 1995- increases constantly and itThe process of liberalization of international trade and of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) has constituted a broadly accepted trend during the last few decades.[1]

  • As well as the changing environment for national security or the quest to protect technologies and sectors of the economy considered vital for the host country, its sovereignty and competitiveness are creating a new reality that will necessarily affect both, the legal framework and the global fluxes of FDI

  • This may lead to the protection of certain strategic sectors of the economy of the country or flagship firms from foreign investment on national security, national essential security interests or related grounds

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Agencies (WAIPA) —the Association of Investment Promotion Agencies which was established in 1995- increases constantly and it. Tension exists between the commitment towards freedom of FDI and the right of the state to ensure that certain legitimate public interests and goals can be fully implemented This may lead to the protection of certain strategic sectors of the economy of the country or flagship firms from foreign investment on national security, national essential security interests or related grounds. There are growing concern by states and public opinion about the compatibility of FDI, or at least of FDI coming from certain countries and targeting certain areas of the economy, with the protection and safeguarding of some values, policies and objectives of the host state in certain areas.[28]

Potential national security threats generated by FDI
46 UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND
The target of the investment
Mechanisms to control FDI ex ante on national security or related grounds
Maintenance of state’s monopolies
Equity limitation
Findings
Some final ideas: A “long and winding”
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call