Abstract
The statistics on plagiarism are staggering. No wonder, then, that many colleges and universities have started using plagiarism detection services /PDSs) such as Turnitin. But there are problems- and more problems than most critics have recognized. Whereas critics typically focus on legal issues related to intellectual property and privacy rights, I argue that unless we can reasonably suspect academic dishonesty, its morally problematic to require submission through a PDS. Even if we insist that the benefits of PDS use are worth the costs of saddling students with an undeserved burden of proof, blanket PDS use―that is, using PDSs across the board and without reasonable suspicion- is problematic because it conflicts with one of the aims of educational institutions: to cultivate students' characters. Although blanket PDS use may in fact deter plagiarism, it doesn't create an environment conducive to the formation of honor, and it may even be a hindrance.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
