Abstract

In the revision of Retrophyllum published in a previous issue of the Edinburgh Journal of Botany, the barcode for the specimen designated on page 208 line 10 as lectotype of Retrophyllum minus (Carrière) C.N. Page was incorrectly given as P00118110 instead of P00188110.

Highlights

  • In the revision of Retrophyllum published in a previous issue of the Edinburgh Journal of Botany, the barcode for the specimen designated on page 208 line 10 as lectotype of Retrophyllum minus (Carrière) C.N

  • Page 254, line 20: ‘P00118108’ should read ‘P00188108’

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the revision of Retrophyllum published in a previous issue of the Edinburgh Journal of Botany, the barcode for the specimen designated on page 208 line 10 as lectotype of Retrophyllum minus (Carrière) C.N. Page was incorrectly given as P00118110 instead of P00188110.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call