Abstract

Since isolates of Hymenolepis nana infecting humans and rodents are morphologically indistinguishable, the only way they can be reliably identified is by comparing the parasite in each host using molecular tools. In the current study, isolates of H. nana from rodent and human hosts from a broad geographical range were sequenced at the ribosomal first internal transcribed spacer (ITS1), the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (C01) gene and the nuclear paramyosin gene loci. Twenty-three isolates of H. nana were sequenced at the ITS1 locus and this confirmed the existence of spacers which, although similar in length (approximately 646 bp), differed in their primary sequences which led to the separation of the isolates into 2 clusters when analysed phylogenetically. This sequence variation was not, however, related to the host of origin of the isolate, thus was not a marker of genetic distinction between H. nana from rodents and humans. Sequencing of a 444 bp fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase 1 gene (C01) in 9 isolates of H. nana from rodents and 6 from humans identified a phylogenetically supported genetic divergence of approximately 5% between some mouse and human isolates. This suggests that H. nana is a species complex, or 'cryptic' species (=morphologically identical yet genetically distinct). A small segment of the nuclear gene, paramyosin, (625 bp or 840 bp) was sequenced in 4 mouse and 3 human isolates of H. nana. However, this gene did not provide the level of heterogeneity required to distinguish between isolates from rodent and human hosts. From the results obtained from faster evolving genes, and the epidemiological evidence, we believe that the life-cycle of H. nana that exists in the north-west of Western Australia is likely to involve mainly 'human to human' transmission.

Highlights

  • The tapeworm Hymenolepis nana was first described as Taenia nana by Von Siebold in 1852 as a parasite found in humans

  • The aim of this study was, to sequence the ribosomal internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1), mitochondrial C01 and part of the paramyosin gene of numerous Hymenolepis isolates collected from humans and mice from several geographically separated regions to ascertain whether any significant genetic differences existed between H. nana isolates from the two host types

  • The ITS1 region was sequenced from 23 isolates of H. nana (11 human, 12 mouse)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The tapeworm Hymenolepis nana was first described as Taenia nana by Von Siebold in 1852 as a parasite found in humans. Fraterna (see Joyeux, 1920 and Skrabin & Matevosan, 1945 in Baer & Tenora, 1970) Controversy over their status as a single or dual species and host specificity has existed ever since (Baer & Tenora, 1970 ; Schantz, 1996). H. nana (von Siebold, 1852) and H. fraterna (Stiles, 1906) are classified as Rodentolepis nana and R. fraterna respectively by some taxonomists Despite this revised nomenclature, the original confusion of speciation and host specificity remains to be solved. Inoculation of the same samples into thymus deficient- and cortisone

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.