Abstract

Both molecular mechanical and quantum mechanical calculations play an important role in describing the behavior and structure of molecules. In this work, we compare for the same peptide systems the results obtained from folding molecular dynamics simulations with previously reported results from quantum mechanical calculations. More specifically, three molecular dynamics simulations of 5 μs each in explicit water solvent were carried out for three Asn-Gly-containing heptapeptides, in order to study their folding and dynamics. Previous data, based on quantum mechanical calculations within the DFT framework have shown that these peptides adopt β-turn structures in aqueous solution, with type I’ β-turn being the most preferred motif. The results from our analyses indicate that at least for the given systems, force field and simulation protocol, the two methods diverge in their predictions. The possibility of a force field-dependent deficiency is examined as a possible source of the observed discrepancy.

Highlights

  • Introduction βTurns are structural motifs defined by four consecutive residues (i to i+3) with the distance between the Cα(i) and Cα(i+3) atoms being less than 7 Å and where the central two residues are not helical [1,2,3,4,5]

  • The primary aim of this communication was to evaluate the ability of the AMBER99SB -ILDN force field to reproduce the structures of turn-forming peptides which were previously

  • Asn-Gly-containing heptapeptides: Comparison between DFT and molecular dynamics simulations characterized by quantum mechanical (QM)-DFT calculations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Turns are structural motifs defined by four consecutive residues (i to i+3) with the distance between the Cα(i) and Cα(i+3) atoms being less than 7 Å and where the central two residues are not helical ( a β-turn may overlap the end of an α-helix by up to three residues) [1,2,3,4,5]. They are typically classified into distinct categories based on the distribution of φ and ψ torsion angles of residues i+1 and i+2 [1,2,3]. Type I and II β-turns are the most common types of β-turns found in proteins, with the ideal torsion angles (φi+1, ψi+1, φi+2, ψi+2) in each of these categories being (-60 ̊, -30 ̊, -90 ̊, 0 ̊) and (-60 ̊, 120 ̊, 80 ̊, 0 ̊), respectively, whereas, the corresponding values for their “mirror-image” type I’ and II’ β-turns are (60 ̊, 30 ̊, 90 ̊, 0 ̊) and (60 ̊, -120 ̊, -80 ̊,0 ̊) [1].

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call