Abstract

Abstract A simple model of two vertical modes is constructed and analyzed to reveal the basic instability mechanisms of convectively coupled waves. The main novelty of this model is a convective parameterization based on the quasi-equilibrium concept and simplified for a model of two vertical modes. It hypothesizes 1) the approximate invariance of the difference between saturation moist static energy in the lower half of the troposphere and moist static energy in the subcloud layer, regardless of free troposphere humidity, and 2) that variations in the depth of convection are determined by moisture-deficit variations in the midtroposphere. Physical arguments for such a treatment are presented. For realistic model parameters chosen based on cloud system resolving model simulations (CSRMs) of an earlier study, the model produces unstable waves at wavelengths and with structures that compare well with the CSRM simulations and observations. A moisture–stratiform instability and a direct–stratiform instability are identified as the main instability mechanisms in the model. The former relies on the effect of midtroposphere humidity on the depth of convection. The latter relies on the climatological mean convective heating profile being top heavy, and it is identified to be the same as the stratiform instability mechanism proposed by B. E. Mapes. The moisture–stratiform instability appears to be the main instability mechanism for the convectively coupled wave development in the CSRM simulations. The finite response time of convection has a damping effect on the waves that is stronger at high wavenumbers. The net moistening effect of the second-mode convective heating also damps the waves, but more strongly at low wavenumbers. These effects help to shape the growth rate curve so that the most unstable waves are of a few thousand kilometers in scale.

Highlights

  • More recent observations of these waves revealed a significant second baroclinic component in their vertical temperature structures (e.g. Wheeler et al, 2000;Straub and Kiladis, 2002;Haertel and Kiladis, 2004). Such observations alone do not contradict models based only on the first baroclinic mode; it is possible that the first baroclinic mode captures the basic dynamics and the second mode temperature structure is a byproduct

  • The more convincing evidence for the inadequacy of the first baroclinic mode models is that they do not yield instability without external destabilization mechanisms (Emanuel et al, 1994), which is inconsistent with the results of cloud system resolving model (CSRM) simulations (e.g. Tulich et al, 2006;Kuang, 2007)

  • For convection in the lower troposphere we neglect the effect of entrainment and for convection reaching the upper troposphere, we emphasize the effect of entrainment and the impact of environmental moisture deficit

Read more

Summary

A Moisture-Stratiform Instability for Convectively Coupled Waves

The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. A moisture-stratiform instability for convectively coupled waves. Zhiming Kuang Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences and School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University. Submitted to the Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, March 2, 2007 Revised, June 14, 2007

Introduction
Formulation and linear analyses of the simple model
The basic instability mechanisms
Summary and discussion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.