Abstract

Abstract. A moist idealized test case (MITC) for atmospheric model dynamical cores is presented. The MITC is based on the Held–Suarez (HS) test that was developed for dry simulations on “a flat Earth” and replaces the full physical parameterization package with a Newtonian temperature relaxation and Rayleigh damping of the low-level winds. This new variant of the HS test includes moisture and thereby sheds light on the nonlinear dynamics–physics moisture feedbacks without the complexity of full-physics parameterization packages. In particular, it adds simplified moist processes to the HS forcing to model large-scale condensation, boundary-layer mixing, and the exchange of latent and sensible heat between the atmospheric surface and an ocean-covered planet. Using a variety of dynamical cores of the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR)'s Community Atmosphere Model (CAM), this paper demonstrates that the inclusion of the moist idealized physics package leads to climatic states that closely resemble aquaplanet simulations with complex physical parameterizations. This establishes that the MITC approach generates reasonable atmospheric circulations and can be used for a broad range of scientific investigations. This paper provides examples of two application areas. First, the test case reveals the characteristics of the physics–dynamics coupling technique and reproduces coupling issues seen in full-physics simulations. In particular, it is shown that sudden adjustments of the prognostic fields due to moist physics tendencies can trigger undesirable large-scale gravity waves, which can be remedied by a more gradual application of the physical forcing. Second, the moist idealized test case can be used to intercompare dynamical cores. These examples demonstrate the versatility of the MITC approach and suggestions are made for further application areas. The new moist variant of the HS test can be considered a test case of intermediate complexity.

Highlights

  • Atmospheric general circulation models (GCMs) are important tools for understanding the climate system

  • We demonstrate that the moist idealized test case (MITC) approach exposes intricacies of the physics–dynamics coupling strategy that cannot be revealed in dry HS experiments

  • We demonstrate the strength of the MITC approach in revealing the intricacies of the physics–dynamics coupling strategy in CAM5-spectral element (SE)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Atmospheric general circulation models (GCMs) are important tools for understanding the climate system. Two moist extensions of the HS test were described by Grabowski and Smolarkiewicz (2002) and Kurowski et al (2015), who relaxed the water vapor mixing ratio towards specified relative humidity values Their method was not focused on mimicking the Earth’s atmospheric flow conditions, as we do in this paper, but instead only demonstrated the use of an idealized test in understanding the characteristics of new numerical methods with moisture feedbacks. We propose a slightly modified variant of the HS forcing and include moisture processes via very few simplified physical parameterizations on a water-covered planet similar to Reed and Jablonowski (2012) ( referred to as RJ12), such as some bulk aerodynamic latent and sensible heat fluxes at the surface, a simple boundary-layer mixing of temperature and moisture, and large-scale precipitation. 1 month always contains 30 days and is independent of the actual calendar months

Large-scale precipitation
Prescribed boundary conditions
Surface fluxes
Boundary-layer mixing
Radiation
Physics–dynamics coupling
Brief description of the four CAM5 dynamical cores
Comparison of the MITC and aquaplanet general circulations in CAM5-SE
Dynamical fields and eddy components
Vertical velocity and moisture distributions
Precipitation rates
Convectively coupled equatorial waves
MITC example applications
An analysis of the physics–dynamics coupling in CAM5-SE
Snapshots of a moist dynamical core intercomparison
An assessment of numerical noise
Kinetic energy spectra
Precipitation-related processes
Suggested further extensions of the MITC approach
Addition of a deep convection scheme
Use of a Kessler-type warm-rain scheme
Inclusion of water mountains
Impact of land–sea masks
Slab ocean configurations
Varying moisture conditions for tropical wave and stratospheric QBO studies
Grid imprinting
Physics–dynamics coupling interfaces
Community-wide moist dynamical core intercomparisons
Findings
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.