Abstract

Emergency responders frequently request satellite-based crisis information for flood monitoring to target the often-limited resources and to prioritize response actions throughout a disaster situation. We present a generic processing chain that covers all modules required for operational flood monitoring from multi-spectral satellite data. This includes data search, ingestion and preparation, water segmentation and mapping of flooded areas. Segmentation of the water extent is done by a convolutional neural network that has been trained on a global dataset of Landsat TM, ETM+, OLI and Sentinel-2 images. Clouds, cloud shadows and snow/ice are specifically handled by the network to remove potential biases from downstream analysis. Compared to previous work in this direction, the method does not require atmospheric correction or post-processing and does not rely on ancillary data. Our method achieves an Overall Accuracy (OA) of 0.93, Kappa of 0.87 and Dice coefficient of 0.90. It outperforms a widely used Random Forest classifier and a Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) threshold method. We introduce an adaptable reference water mask that is derived by time-series analysis of archive imagery to distinguish flood from permanent water. When tested against manually produced rapid mapping products for three flood disasters (Germany 2013, China 2016 and Peru 2017), the method achieves ≥ 0.92 OA, ≥ 0.86 Kappa and ≥ 0.90 Dice coefficient. Furthermore, we present a flood monitoring application centred on Bihar, India. The processing chain produces very high OA (0.94), Kappa (0.92) and Dice coefficient (0.97) and shows consistent performance throughout a monitoring period of one year that involves 19 Landsat OLI ( μ Kappa = 0.92 and σ Kappa = 0.07 ) and 61 Sentinel-2 images ( μ Kappa = 0.92 , σ Kappa = 0.05 ). Moreover, we show that the mean effective revisit period (considering cloud cover) can be improved significantly by multi-sensor combination (three days with Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2, and Landsat OLI).

Highlights

  • Floods are difficult to monitor over large areas, because they are typically determined by complex interactions between different conditions such as precipitation, slope of terrain, drainage network, protective structures, land-cover and many other factors

  • We present a prototypical processing chain for automated flood monitoring from multi-spectral satellite images that aims at complementing existing flood services from TerraSAR-X [5] and Sentinel-1 [6]

  • We introduced a modular processing chain for automated flood monitoring from multi-spectral satellite data

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Floods are difficult to monitor over large areas, because they are typically determined by complex interactions between different conditions such as precipitation, slope of terrain, drainage network, protective structures, land-cover and many other factors. Despite the inherent benefits of SAR, it is crucial for any satellite-based flood monitoring system to be able to simultaneously use data from a large variety of platforms and sensors in order to assure that geo-information products have the highest possible spatial and temporal resolutions and information content [4] To this regard, we present a prototypical processing chain for automated flood monitoring from multi-spectral satellite images that aims at complementing existing flood services from TerraSAR-X [5] and Sentinel-1 [6]. We present a prototypical processing chain for automated flood monitoring from multi-spectral satellite images that aims at complementing existing flood services from TerraSAR-X [5] and Sentinel-1 [6] This modular solution covers all aspects from data search, ingestion and preparation to cloud and cloud shadow masking, water segmentation and mapping of flooded areas. It focuses on systematically acquired multi-spectral satellite images with high spatial resolution (10–30 m ground sampling distance) [7] and large swath width (> 150 km), namely images from Landsat TM, ETM+, OLI and Sentinel-2 sensors

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.