Abstract
The reliability of the Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Rating Scale (PSPRS) using teleneurology has not been assessed. To test whether removing items inadequately assessed by video would impact measurement of PSP severity and progression. We performed secondary analyses of two data sets: the phase 2/3 trial of Davunetide in PSP and a large single-center cohort. We examined two modifications of the PSPRS: (1) removing neck rigidity, limb rigidity, and postural stability (25 items; mPSPRS-25) and (2) also removing three ocular motor items and limb dystonia (21 items; mPSPRS-21). Proportional agreement relative to the possible total scores was measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient, compared to the original PSPRS baseline values and change over 6 and 12months. We examined the ability of both scales to predict survival in the single-center cohort using proportional hazards models. The mPSPRS-25 showed excellent agreement (0.99; P < 0.001) with the original PSPRS at baseline, 0.98 (P < 0.001) agreement in measuring change over 6 months, and 0.98 (P < 0.001) over 12months. The mPSPRS-21 showed agreement of 0.94 (P < 0.001) with the original PSPRS at baseline, 0.92 (P < 0.001) at 6 months, and 0.95 (P < 0.001) at 12months. Baseline and 6-month change in both modified scales were highly predictive of survival in the single-center cohort. Modified versions of the PSPRS which can be administered remotely show excellent agreement with the original scale and predict survival in PSP. The mPSPRS-21 should facilitate clinical care and research in PSP via teleneurology. © 2022 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Accepted Version
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
