A modified method for reconstruction of posterior tibial tendon after resection of juvenile painful type II accessory navicular

Abstract

BackgroundThe surgical treatment of accessory navicular (AN) is divided into simple resection of AN and Kidner surgery used to reconstruct posterior tibial tendon (PTT) after AN resection. However, both of these procedures have certain disadvantages. Herein, we proposed a modified method to reconstruct PTT and compared the short-term clinical effect of our method with the modified Kidner procedure.MethodsWe collected data from 23 adolescent children with painful type II AN treated in our department between January 2015 and June 2020. The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hind foot (AOFAS-AH) Scores, the Meary Angle, and Pitch Angle of the lateral weight-bearing plain radiographs status were recorded before and after the operation to evaluate the treatment outcomes.ResultsIn the modified Kidner surgery (MK) group, the median AOFAS-AH increased from 61 (59–68) to 87 (83–91) (P < 0.05); the Pitch angle of the lateral weight-bearing plain radiographs increased from 13.0 (8–18) to 17.4 (14–22), and the Meary angle decreased from 18.3 (14–24) to 14.2 (8–20) (P < 0.05). In the PTT preservation folded suture (FS) group, the median AOFAS-AH increased from 61 (59–68) to 87 (85–91) (P < 0.05); the Pitch angle of the lateral weight-bearing plain radiographs increased from 12.3 (7–18) to 18.4 (15–26), and the Meary angle decreased from 17.8 (13–23) to 5.7 (3–8) (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in AOFAS-AH postoperative scores between the FS group and MK group; however, the improvement on Pitch and Meary angle of the lateral weight-bearing plain radiographs was significantly better in the FS group than in MK group (P < 0.05).ConclusionsFor painful type II AN in juvenile patients, the insertion-preserving folding suture procedure had similar short-term results on AOFAS-AH scores but greater improvement in the Meary angle and the Pitch Angle than the modified Kidner method.Level of Evidence: III