Abstract

This paper presents a methodology for building a consensus among the stakeholders based on the level of importance of each evaluation criterion to choose the best final design, approach, or solution for a project. The proposed methodology adopts an improved vague set minimum-cost consensus model (MCCM) and a modified Delphi method. This paper discusses several shortcomings of the traditional MCCM and the Delphi method. It argues that humans’ resistance to change based on a numerical rating scale follows a natural logarithm pattern instead of a linear or quadratic pattern as claimed in other studies. Hence, the traditional MCCM needs to be revised accordingly. In addition, an experiment was concluded to compare the proposed consensus-building methodology with the traditional Delphi method. The experiment showed that the proposed methodology is better than the traditional Delphi method regarding using fewer rounds to reach a consensus. At last, this paper applies the proposed methodology to the field of road junction design selection.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.