Abstract

Introduction: Although the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) is widely used for evaluating patients with schizophrenia, the meaning of the weights of the individual symptoms is ambiguous. The aims of the study were 1) to investigate whether the modification of relative weights of items of the BPRS is able to enhance its correlation with the Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia scale (CGI-SCH) and 2) to construct a potential modified BPRS. Methods: We evaluated 200 schizophrenia patients using the BPRS and the CGI-SCH and drew the scatter plot distributions of the two scales. Next, univariate regression for the CGI-SCH using individual symptoms of the BPRS was performed. Multivariate regression utilizing the ‘logistic function’ was then conducted to allocate marks to each item and Pearson’s r correlation coefficient and r-squared between the two scales were assessed. After that, we constructed an example of a potential modified BPRS. Results: With the scatter plot for the two scales, a logarithmic curve was obtained; this was described by [CGI-SCH] = 3.2248 × ln[18-item BPRS] – 7.2044 (p i” that could express the relative weights of individual symptoms. Subsequently, modification of point allocations according to “Pi” yielded a Pearson’s r of 0.8491 and an r-squared of 0.7718 (not changed) (both p < 0.001). An example of a potential modified BPRS was constructed. Conclusions: Within the limits of our data, the weightings of items of the BPRS improved the correlation of the BPRS with the CGI-SCH for evaluating schizophrenia.

Highlights

  • The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) is widely used for evaluating patients with schizophrenia, the meaning of the weights of the individual symptoms is ambiguous

  • The aims of the present study were: 1) to confirm whether a modification of point allocation to individual items rather than a selection of items is able to enhance the degree of correlation of the 18-item BPRS with the CGI-SCH global impression of the severity of schizophrenia, utilizing non-linear multivariate regression analysis with a logistic function; and 2) to consider an example of a potential modified BPRS that expresses relative weights of respective symptoms and would be expected to have improved correlation with the CGI-SCH scores compared with the original 18-item BPRS

  • Pearson’s r coefficient for the relationship between the 18-item BPRS and the CGI-SCH was 0.8216 (p < 0.001) and r-squared was 0.7718 (p-value of analysis of variance (ANOVA) was less than 0.001)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) is widely used for evaluating patients with schizophrenia, the meaning of the weights of the individual symptoms is ambiguous. The aims of the study were 1) to investigate whether the modification of relative weights of items of the BPRS is able to enhance its correlation with the Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia scale (CGI-SCH) and 2) to construct a potential modified BPRS. Methods: We evaluated 200 schizophrenia patients using the BPRS and the CGI-SCH and drew the scatter plot distributions of the two scales. Multivariate regression utilizing the “logistic function” was conducted to allocate marks to each item and Pearson’s r correlation coefficient and r-squared between the two scales were assessed. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) [2] is one of the standard instruments used most frequently in daily practice for evaluating the severity of schizophrenia. The BPRS includes 18 items and the allocation of marks is defined clearly, as all items have the same range of marks (from 1 (not present) to 7 (extremely severe), with “0” meaning “not as-

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.