Abstract

Honeybees (Apis mellifera) play a significant role in the pollination of various food crops and plants. In the past decades, honeybee management has been challenged with increased pathogen and environmental pressure associating with increased beekeeping costs, having a marked economic impact on the beekeeping industry. Pathogens have been identified as a contributing cause of colony losses. Evidence suggested a possible route of pathogen transmission among bees via oral-oral contacts through trophallaxis. Here we propose a model that describes the transmission of an infection within a colony when bee members engage in the trophallactic activity to distribute nectar. In addition, we examine two important features of social immunity, defined as collective disease defenses organized by honeybee society. First, our model considers the social segregation of worker bees. The segregation limits foragers, which are highly exposed to pathogens during foraging outside the nest, from interacting with bees residing in the inner parts of the nest. Second, our model includes a hygienic response, by which healthy nurse bees exterminate infected bees to mitigate horizontal transmission of the infection to other bee members. We propose that the social segregation forms the first line of defense in reducing the uptake of pathogens into the colony. If the first line of defense fails, the hygienic behavior provides a second mechanism in preventing disease spread. Our study identifies the rate of egg-laying as a critical factor in maintaining the colony's health against an infection. We propose that winter conditions which cease or reduce the egg-laying activity combined with an infection in early spring can compromise the social immunity defenses and potentially cause colony losses.

Highlights

  • Agricultural productivity depends greatly on both wild and managed pollinators [1]

  • As trophallaxis is essential for communication and nectar distribution in honeybee colonies, it may play a critical role in disease transmission

  • We developed a generic model describing how an infection spreads within the colony when bee members engage in the trophallactic activity to distribute nectar

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Agricultural productivity depends greatly on both wild and managed pollinators [1]. It was estimated that insect pollinators contributed to the economic value of crop production around 153 billion euros worldwide (2005 estimate) [2]. Eberl et al [36] studied a model of interactions between honeybees, V. destructor, and ABPV, and identified a threshold number of worker bees required to maintain the brood-rearing activity. Khoury et al [37] developed a model to investigate the forager death rate as a key factor driving the colony to failure They proposed that as stressors elevate the forager death rate, worker bees at younger ages are recruited to forage. The model was later expanded to incorporate an age structure of the worker bees [42] These models link the dynamics of pathogenic infections inside the colony with the dynamics of the honeybee population to explain colony losses. The two features constitute the social immunity in our model and play a crucial role in preventing horizontal transmission of pathogens from the infected ones to other nest-mates. Our model provides a possible explanation of massive and widespread colony losses in early spring, a phenomenon known as “spring dwindling.”

Results and discussion
À nF kFR ðR0 þ iR0Þ F1 þ kr F0
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call