Abstract

BackgroundA previous theoretic model (Tumour Biol 2013;34:1–7.) that breast tumor types differ in the relative rate of tissue invasion was elaborated and developed on a consecutive case series.MethodHistologic data of 68 ductal breast cancer in situ (DCIS) and 1180 invasive ductal cancer (IDC) patients were collected and analyzed.ResultsER+PgR− phenotype was more common in Luminal B2 than among the pooled Luminal A&B1 (p = 0.0002), and more frequent in Luminal B1 than in Luminal A (p = 0.0167). The same phenotype was associated with the age older than 54 years in Luminal B1 and in B2 patients. HER2 type cancers were more frequent in older patients (p = 0.0038).Tumor progression from DCIS to IDC was found 39% faster than the average in Luminal B1 tumors, supporting the clinical importance of this tumor type. A rare combination of low Ki-67 in HER2 type cancers (only 14% of HER2 type cancers) showed very slow transition to IDC (occurring at only 53.55% of average progression rate), while triple-negative cancers progressed faster than the average, despite Ki-67 value (104.63% for low and 114.27% for high Ki-67 tumors).In three tumor types with positive steroid receptors the ER+PgR− phenotype showed slower IDC transition than the ER+PgR+ phenotype of the same tumor type (difference in progression rate was 38% for Luminal A, 46% for Luminal B1 and 67% for Luminal B2 with Ki67 > 14%).Triple-negative tumors in younger patients exceeded the expected average progression rate by 24%, while in HER2 type tumors, the rate of tissue invasion was in younger patients 20% lower than the expected value.ConclusionsThe relative rate of tissue invasion differed substantialy among our patients. Differences depended on tumor types, steroid expression phenotypes and age. The dysfunctional ERs in the ER+PgR− phenotype showed slower rates of tissue invasion, suggesting that ligand binding to functional breast tumor ERs, beside promoting the PgR expression, possibly also promotes tumor transition to the invasive phase.In triple-negative tumors, an age dependent premenopausal mechanism possibly acted as an accelerator of tissue invasion, while faster tissue invasion by HER2-overexpressed tumors in older patients possibly depended on an unidentified mechanism that takes more time to be acquired, so it was less present in premenopausal patients.

Highlights

  • Ductal breast cancer in situ (DCIS) seems to precede invasive ductal cancer (IDC)

  • In triple-negative tumors, an age dependent premenopausal mechanism possibly acted as an accelerator of tissue invasion, while faster tissue invasion by HER2-overexpressed tumors in older patients possibly depended on an unidentified mechanism that takes more time to be acquired, so it was less present in premenopausal patients

  • A previously developed theoretic model, from the pooled published breast cancer data [1], suggested that all breast cancer types evolve from DCIS lesions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ductal breast cancer in situ (DCIS) seems to precede invasive ductal cancer (IDC). This idea is based on a high degree of similarity between molecular alterations in DCIS and invasive cancer in the same patient [1,2], triple-negative invasive cancers may seem almost to lack their triple-negative DCIS precursor [3,4,5,6].If all breast cancer types evolve from DCIS lesions, more aggressive breast cancer types can be recognized by comparing breast tumor type distributions between DCIS lesions and invasive breast cancers [1]. The basic idea is that at the time of breast tumor diagnosis more aggressive tumor types will have fewer DCIS lesions in comparison to less aggressive types with more tumors still in the DCIS phase This model, based on reported data of breast cancer characteristics pooled from several studies, was proposed in a recent theoretic article [1]. Differences in the incidences of the main breast cancer types (Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2overexpressed and the triple-negative tumors) between DCIS and invasive ductal cancers (IDC) were used to calculate the relative rate of progression from the in situ stage to invasive form. This calculated value is probably not directly related to the course of disease. A previous theoretic model (Tumour Biol 2013;34:1–7.) that breast tumor types differ in the relative rate of tissue invasion was elaborated and developed on a consecutive case series

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call