Abstract
This paper discusses a protocol and rationale for peer and student involvement in the assessment of courses in engineering at Stanford University, USA. The protocol is based upon elements of good teaching practice, and on standards for peer review as used in journal publication. It has been prototyped in nine engineering courses over the past two years and has generally been found to be a good mechanism for near real-time monitoring that creates constructive feedback for teaching and learning quality control. Major features of this ongoing project are summarized, including faculty attitudes and required time commitment.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
