Abstract

The last decade has witnessed an unmasking of diagnostic failure along with the recognition that it is a major source of morbidity and mortality. It is now regarded as the dominant threat to patient safety. While healthcare systems are responsible, in part, for what goes wrong in failed diagnostic processes, a greater measure of accountability lies with the ways in which physicians think, reason, solve problems, and make decisions. This has led to a growing awareness of the need for explicit training in clinical decision-making during medical training. Drawing heavily on the cognitive sciences literature, a consensus has emerged that rationality is the essential characteristic of the well-calibrated decision-maker. Cognitive and affective biases, in turn, are critical determinants of the rationality of the decision-maker. Incorporating developments in several adjacent areas, we can now assemble a model that embraces the major components of clinical decision-making. Its properties are outlined here.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.