Abstract
BackgroundSecondhand smoke (SHS) exposure in children and adolescents has adverse health effects. For adolescents of lower socioeconomic status (SES), exposure is widespread, evidenced in the measurement of urinary cotinine, a major metabolite of nicotine. Direct intervention with exposed children has been proposed as a novel method, yet there is minimal evidence of its efficacy. Combining this approach with a mobile health (mHealth) intervention may be more time and cost-effective and feasible for adolescent populations.ObjectiveIn this pilot study, we assessed the feasibility and preliminary evidence of efficacy of a 30-day text message–based mHealth intervention targeted at reducing SHS exposure in adolescent populations of low SES.MethodsFor the study, 14 nonsmoking and nonvaping participants between the ages of 12-21 years exposed to SHS were enrolled. The intervention consisted of a daily text message sent to the participants over the course of a month. Text message types included facts and information about SHS, behavioral methods for SHS avoidance, or true-or-false questions. Participants were asked to respond to each message within 24 hours as confirmation of receipt. Feasibility outcomes included completion of the 30-day intervention, receiving and responding to text messages, and feedback on the messages. Efficacy outcomes included a reduction in urinary cotinine, accuracy of true-or-false responses, and participants’ perceptions of effectiveness.ResultsOf the 14 participants that were enrolled, 13 completed the intervention. Though not required, all participants had their own cell phones with unlimited text messaging plans. Of the total number of text messages sent to the 13 completers, 91% (372/407) of them received on-time responses. Participant feedback was generally positive, with most requesting more informational and true-or-false questions. In terms of efficacy, 54% (6/11) of participants reduced their cotinine levels (however, change for the group overall was not statistically significant (P=.33) and 45% (5/11) of participants increased their cotinine levels. Of the total number of true-or-false questions sent across all completers, 77% (56/73) were answered correctly. Participants’ ratings of message effectiveness averaged 85 on a scale of 100.ConclusionsIn this pilot study, the intervention was feasible as the majority of participants had access to a cell phone, completed the study, and engaged by responding to the messages. The efficacy of the study requires further replication, as only half of the participants reduced their cotinine levels. However, participants answered the majority of true-or-false questions accurately and reported that the messages were helpful.
Highlights
Secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure is associated with adverse health effects in children and adolescents, including respiratory disease and asthma [1,2,3,4]
Of the total number of text messages sent to the 13 completers, 91% (372/407) of them received on-time responses
Participants’ ratings of message effectiveness averaged 85 on a scale of 100. In this pilot study, the intervention was feasible as the majority of participants had access to a cell phone, completed the study, and engaged by responding to the messages
Summary
Secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure is associated with adverse health effects in children and adolescents, including respiratory disease and asthma [1,2,3,4]. In a study of adolescents of low socioeconomic status (SES) in San Francisco, California, 76% were found to have recent light or heavy SHS exposure based on biochemical screening of the major nicotine metabolite, cotinine, with ranges of 0.05-30 ng/mL [5]. Many have focused on intervening on parental or caregiver smoking status, with a recent meta-analytic review demonstrating that some studies were effective at reducing SHS exposure while many others were not [7]. Secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure in children and adolescents has adverse health effects. Direct intervention with exposed children has been proposed as a novel method, yet there is minimal evidence of its efficacy Combining this approach with a mobile health (mHealth) intervention may be more time and cost-effective and feasible for adolescent populations
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.