Abstract

Natural disturbance regimes play key roles in shaping forest structure and development at stand and landscape levels. Disturbances are commonly complex and variable, such that classical dichotomous characterization of disturbance regimes as following large infrequent disturbances or patch dynamics is too simplistic, especially when the resulting damage is more severe than the baseline of a single tree patch dynamic, but not severe enough to represent large infrequent disturbance. Ongoing climate change affects mountain Picea abies forests in Central, East and Southeastern Europe by an increasing frequency of storms and bark beetle outbreaks. We present a unique study based on extensive dataset aimed to reveal the spatiotemporal pattern of the disturbance history and role of the mixed severity disturbances in primary spruce mountain forest landscapes in the Ukrainian Carpathians.We reconstructed canopy disturbance history and maximum disturbance severity using ca. 2396 tree cores in 96 sample plots. Neither large-scale stand-replacement nor fine scale dynamics was the prevailing disturbance over the last four centuries. Rather, we observed a complex spatiotemporal pattern of mixed severity disturbances. Canopy turnover time ranged between 50 and 300years and depended on the maximum severity of the disturbance event. Spatial analyses revealed no similarity in spatiotemporal pattern across disturbance histories or maximum disturbance severities. We observed evidence of a combination of variable severity disturbances that fails to fit the classical scheme of gap or patch dynamics with sharply defined sizes and borders, but is more consistent with a mixed severity disturbance regime across the landscape. Windstorms were likely the most important past disturbance agent. The probability of an epidemic bark beetle attack was low, although the possibility of small local outbreaks cannot be excluded. An additional, potentially overlooked, agent of disturbance could be historic periods of extreme cold.This reconstructed disturbance regime may challenge existing silvicultural systems in the Carpathians, calling for a more complex spatiotemporal forest management approach. However, mimicking a mixed severity disturbance regime can be done at the forest management level by applying a range of disturbance severities at the stand level.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call