A Mixed Methods Study Exploring Patient Perspectives and Outcome Measures From Not Fasting Before Cardiac Catheterisation

Abstract

This study aimed to describe the patient experience and incidence of adverse events in unfasted patients undergoing coronary angiography and angioplasty. In addition, to identify any association between duration of fasting and adverse events. Historically, patients were fasted before elective cardiac catheterisation. Routine fasting was not evidence-based, and many centres, including our unit, have discontinued the practice. Patients undergoing cardiac catheterisation at a large urban teaching hospital were invited to participate in a prospective observational cohort study documenting the duration of fasting and incidence of adverse events (n=508). Of these participants, 257 also completed a survey that captured perspectives and opinions regarding not fasting. The mean time since last fluid was 1.9±2.2 hours and for food was 3.9±3.7 hours. The most common adverse event was hypotension (10.0%). Rates of nausea (3.9%) and vomiting (0.6%) were low, and there were no episodes of aspiration. No associations were identified between the time since the last food or fluid and any adverse events. Thematic analysis of survey data yielded three themes: (1) in most, not fasting is preferable to fasting; (2) being able to eat and drink before the procedure positively affected well-being, and (3) one-fifth of the cohort expressed no preference between fasting and non-fasting. Not fasting before cardiac catheterisation is viewed favourably by patients. While this study provides additional evidence that not fasting is safe, event rates are low, and larger multicentre studies are needed for confirmation.