Abstract

Background Interprofessional team communication has been identified as an important focus for safety in medical emergency care. However, in-depth insight into the complexity of team communication is limited. Video observational studies might fill a gap in terms of understanding the meaning of specific communication interactions and link team performance to patient outcome. This study had two aims. First, to develop a theorybased evaluation instrument that measures and qualifies team communication. And second, to investigate the quality and content of summaries and re-evaluations evolving step wise and progressively when treating the critically ill patient.

Highlights

  • Interprofessional team communication has been identified as an important focus for safety in medical emergency care

  • Video observational studies might fill a gap in terms of understanding the meaning of specific communication interactions and link team performance to patient outcome

  • The study found that complex interprofessional team communication does not readily reduce to mere observation and recording of events

Read more

Summary

Background

Interprofessional team communication has been identified as an important focus for safety in medical emergency care. In-depth insight into the complexity of team communication is limited. Video observational studies might fill a gap in terms of understanding the meaning of specific communication interactions and link team performance to patient outcome. To develop a theorybased evaluation instrument that measures and qualifies team communication. To investigate the quality and content of summaries and re-evaluations evolving step wise and progressively when treating the critically ill patient

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call