Abstract

Spatial context may be important to direct to con­sumer (DTC) programs aimed at improving fresh fruit and vegetable access for low-income individu­als. The purpose of this study was to examine the sociodemographic and geospatial context (distance to pickup sites, number and density of proximal food retail outlets, etc.) surrounding community supported agriculture (CSA) pickup locations in relation to low-income customer residential loca­tions, and to synthesize this information with inter­view-derived perspectives on the challenges and opportunities of the pickup location from DTC producers and customers. This in-depth study examined cost-offset community supported agri­culture (CO-CSA) operations across four U.S. states (New York, North Carolina, Vermont, and Washington) and varying pickup sites (n=23), with pickup operational decisions determined by farm­ers (n=12). Physical addresses of farms, CO-CSA customers, and pickup sites were collected and geocoded. Geographic information systems (GIS) was used to examine road network distances for pickup locations across the study sites. Demo­graphic information at the census block level (e.g., percent racial minority, percent poverty level) was obtained for all study sites. Descriptive statistics were generated for geospatial variables. In-depth interviews with farmers and focus groups with CO-CSA customers were conducted to understand experiences with the CO-CSA in terms of physical access of pickup sites. We found that pickup sites were an average of 6.2 miles (10 kilometers) from customers’ homes, and on average, further than the supermarket (2.9 miles or 4.7 km). Farmers reported their efforts to select convenient pickup locations for low-income customers, though CO-CSA customers expressed mixed levels of accessi­bility. Spatial inaccessibility and differences in soci­odemographic data for customer versus pickup may explain perceived inaccessibility for some cus­tomers. These findings may help inform future approaches to plan and evaluate DTC operations targeting low-income individuals by consider­ing geospatial context and stakeholder experiences. See the press release for this article.

Highlights

  • Introduction and Literature ReviewThe concept that “place matters” is central to the concept of direct to consumer (DTC) retail food system models (Blake, Mellor, & Crane, 2010; Lohr, Diamond, Dicken, & Marquardt, 2011)

  • In combining and comparing the four data sources, we found that farmer perceptions about their distribution approach generally matched CO-community supported agriculture (CSA) participant feedback

  • Not all farmers provided feedback about pickup site locations; in those cases, participants had mixed experiences, with some finding pickup locations challenging in terms of distance or spatially related attributes like proximal parking, with others having no problems with pickup locations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Introduction and Literature ReviewThe concept that “place matters” is central to the concept of direct to consumer (DTC) retail food system models (Blake, Mellor, & Crane, 2010; Lohr, Diamond, Dicken, & Marquardt, 2011). The environmental context of food systems includes physical attributes related to land quality, marketing opportunities, and structures and facilities (including buildings, road networks, and public transportation systems), as well as nonphysical attributes, such as policies and regulations, residents’ demographics, habits, perceptions, and social norms (Blake, Mellor, & Crane, 2010; Lohr, Diamond, Dicken, & Marquardt, 2011; Park, Mishra, & Wozniak, 2014) All these attributes can influence distribution channels and site location for producers to sell their goods, for smaller-scale farmers who may not have the resources to overcome environmental barriers to reach certain populations or locations (Cone & Myhre, 2000; Galt, 2013; Hinrichs & Allen, 2008). Low-income individuals have cited cost, time, transportation, habit, and food preferences as potential barriers to using DTC operations for food purchasing (Leone et al, 2012; McGuirt, Pitts, Seguin, Bentley, DeMarco, & Ammerman, 2018; McGuirt, Ward, Elliott, Bullock, & Pitts, 2014; Racine, Smith Vaughn, & Laditka, 2010). Hilbert, Evans-Cowley,Reece, Rogers, Ake, and Hoy (2014) found that rural lowincome populations may be vulnerable to food-access issues because of transportation costs associated with pursuing a healthy diet, and that policy efforts should always consider placespecific factors given variation in costs

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.