Abstract
BackgroundKnowledge brokering is a knowledge translation approach that includes making connections between researchers and decision-makers to facilitate the latter’s use of evidence in health promotion and the provision of healthcare. Despite knowledge brokering being well-established in Canada, many knowledge gaps exist, including understanding what theoretical frameworks have been developed and which evaluative practices knowledge brokers (KBs) use.MethodsThis study used a mixed methods design to examine how KBs in Canada (1) use frameworks, models and theories in their practice and (2) how they evaluate knowledge brokering interventions. We gathered interview and survey data from KB practitioners to better understand their perspectives on effective practices. Our analysis focused on understanding the theoretical frameworks used by KBs.ResultsThis study demonstrates that KBs in Canada tend not to rely on theories or models that are specific to knowledge brokering. Rather, study participants/respondents draw on (sometimes multiple) theories and models that are fundamental to the broader field of knowledge translation – in particular, the Knowledge to Action model and the Promoting Action Research in Health Sciences framework. In evaluating the impact of their own knowledge brokering practice, participants/respondents use a wide variety of mechanisms. Evaluation was often seen as less important than supporting knowledge users and/or paying clients in accessing and utilising evidence.ConclusionsKnowledge brokering as a form of knowledge translation continues to expand, but the impact on its targeted knowledge users has yet to be clearly established. The quality of engagement between KBs and their clients might increase – the knowledge brokering can be more impactful – if KBs made efforts to describe, understand and evaluate their activities using theories or models specific to KB.
Highlights
Knowledge brokering is a knowledge translation approach that includes making connections between researchers and decision-makers to facilitate the latter’s use of evidence in health promotion and the provision of healthcare
The findings are arranged in two parts, corresponding to the research objectives: examining knowledge brokers (KBs)’ perspectives regarding (1) the use of models and theories to inform knowledge brokering practices, and (2) KBs’ evaluative practices
Dobbins et al [30] recently found that a knowledge translation intervention delivered by KBs resulted in improvements in evidence-informed decisionmaking knowledge, skills and behaviours, suggesting that, if KB researchers develop concrete, actionable indicators and ways to measure them – informed by theories, models or frameworks and keeping in mind a wide range of stakeholder perspectives – perhaps a culture of evaluation can grow within knowledge brokering
Summary
Knowledge brokering is a knowledge translation approach that includes making connections between researchers and decision-makers to facilitate the latter’s use of evidence in health promotion and the provision of healthcare. Despite knowledge brokering being well-established in Canada, many knowledge gaps exist, including understanding what theoretical frameworks have been developed and which evaluative practices knowledge brokers (KBs) use. The public health sector in Canada has been moving toward evidence-informed decision-making for many years [1]. Knowledge brokering is a relatively new approach to knowledge translation in which knowledge brokers (KBs) make connections between researchers and decision-makers to facilitate the latter’s use of evidence in health promotion and the provision of healthcare. KBs’ responsibilities include finding relevant policy and practice research, synthesising it, organising seminars or meetings, supporting linkages between researchers and decisionmakers, and building networks [1,2,3, 6]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
