A mixed-method evaluation of cadaver surgery training for gynecologic oncology.

Abstract

Traditional surgical training techniques with using patients, and new advances with live animals, artificial models, and simulation methods have several shortcomings. There are a few reports on the usefulness of cadaver surgery training (CST) in gynecology. Herein, we used a mixed-method evaluation to qualitatively and quantitatively explore the educational efficacy of CST by conducting CST programs at the Sapporo Medical University, Japan. In 2020, we conducted two CST programs with 45 participants-13 residents, 8 specialists recognized by Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 23 certified endoscopists recognized by Japan Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics Endoscopy and Minimally Invasive Therapy, 15 specialists recognized by Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and 14 certified endoscopists cum oncology. Three participants observed the procedure virtually and 42 were physically present. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic exenteration were performed on five Thiel-embalmed cadavers. Participants were asked to complete pre- and post-training surveys that included qualitative questions, concerning the purpose and cost of CST, and quantitative questions, testing anatomical knowledge. We observed that the rate of score improvement to the quantitative questions increased from 58.6% pre-CST to 75.6% post-CST. Furthermore, oncology specialists and those who performed more surgeries and faced more complications during surgeries recorded high percentage of correct answers. Multiple regression analysis statistically confirmed these results. This study confirmed the educational efficacy of CST.