A Missing Link between Retrotransposons and Retroviruses.

Abstract

ABSTRACTThe origin and deep evolution of retroviruses remain largely unclear. It has been proposed that retroviruses might have originated from a Ty3/Gypsy retrotransposon, but all known Ty3/Gypsy retrotransposons are only distantly related to retroviruses. Retroviruses and some plant Athila/Tat elements (within Ty3/Gypsy retrotransposons) independently evolved a dual RNase H domain and an env/env-like gene. Here, we reported the discovery of a novel lineage of retrotransposons, designated Odin retrotransposons, in the genomes of eight sea anemones (order Actinaria) within the Cnidaria phylum. Odin retrotransposons exhibited unique genome features, encoding a dual RNase H domain (like retroviruses) but no env gene (like most Ty3/Gypsy retrotransposons). Phylogenetic analyses based on reverse transcriptase showed that Odin retrotransposons formed a sister group to lokiretroviruses, and lokiretroviruses and Odin retrotransposons together were sister to canonical retroviruses. Moreover, phylogenetic analyses based on RNase H and integrase also supported the hypothesis that Odin retrotransposons were sisters to lokiretroviruses. Lokiretroviruses and canonical retroviruses did not form a monophyletic group, indicating that lokiretroviruses and canonical retroviruses might represent two distinct virus families. Taken together, the discovery of Odin retrotransposons narrowed down the evolutionary gaps between retrotransposons and canonical retroviruses and lokiretroviruses.