Abstract
Abstract We study the derivation of the Gibbs measure for the nonlinear Schrödinger (NLS) equation from many-body quantum thermal states in the mean-field limit. In this paper, we consider the nonlocal NLS with defocusing and unbounded $L^p$ interaction potentials on $\mathbb{T}^d$ for $d=1,2,3$. This extends the author’s earlier joint work with Fröhlich et al. [ 45], where the regime of defocusing and bounded interaction potentials was considered. When $d=1$, we give an alternative proof of a result previously obtained by Lewin et al. [ 69]. Our proof is based on a perturbative expansion in the interaction. When $d=1$, the thermal state is the grand canonical ensemble. As in [ 45], when $d=2,3$, the thermal state is a modified grand canonical ensemble, which allows us to estimate the remainder term in the expansion. The terms in the expansion are analysed using a graphical representation and are resummed by using Borel summation. By this method, we are able to prove the result for the optimal range of $p$ and obtain the full range of defocusing interaction potentials, which were studied in the classical setting when $d=2,3$ in the work of Bourgain [ 15].
Highlights
We study the derivation of the Gibbs measure for the nonlinear Schrodinger equation (NLS) from many-body quantum thermal states in the high-temperature limit
We study the nonlinear Schrodinger equation (NLS)
The results of this paper can be viewed as a step in the direction of studying more singular interaction potentials
Summary
The invariance of (1.6) under the flow of (1.4) was rigorously established in the work of Bourgain [11–13, 15] and Zhidkov [98] This led to the study of global solutions of NLS-type equations with random initial data of low regularity, see [16–18,21,23,24,31,46,47,77,78,82,95,96]. The results of this paper can be viewed as a step in the direction of studying more singular interaction potentials. We use the convention that positive constants with indices C0, C1, C2 > 0 depend on the dimension d and the chemical potential κ in (1.1). In this case, we will suppress the dependence on these quantities in the notation. We use the convention that inner products are linear in the second variable
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have