Abstract

We proposed a piezoelectric artificial basilar membrane (ABM) composed of a microelectromechanical system cantilever array. The ABM mimics the tonotopy of the cochlea: frequency selectivity and mechanoelectric transduction. The fabricated ABM exhibits a clear tonotopy in an audible frequency range (2.92–12.6 kHz). Also, an animal model was used to verify the characteristics of the ABM as a front end for potential cochlear implant applications. For this, a signal processor was used to convert the piezoelectric output from the ABM to an electrical stimulus for auditory neurons. The electrical stimulus for auditory neurons was delivered through an implanted intra-cochlear electrode array. The amplitude of the electrical stimulus was modulated in the range of 0.15 to 3.5 V with incoming sound pressure levels (SPL) of 70.1 to 94.8 dB SPL. The electrical stimulus was used to elicit an electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR) from deafened guinea pigs. EABRs were successfully measured and their magnitude increased upon application of acoustic stimuli from 75 to 95 dB SPL. The frequency selectivity of the ABM was estimated by measuring the magnitude of EABRs while applying sound pressure at the resonance and off-resonance frequencies of the corresponding cantilever of the selected channel. In this study, we demonstrated a novel piezoelectric ABM and verified its characteristics by measuring EABRs.

Highlights

  • Frequencies according to its width, thickness, and stiffness

  • The results demonstrated that the artificial BMs (ABMs) with a signal processor and intra-cochlear electrode array could induce an auditory evoked potential from deafened guinea pigs, with clear frequency selectivity by way of an implanted intra-cochlear electrode array

  • The total volume of the ABM was 2.5 × 2.5 × 0.6 mm[3], which is sufficiently small for implantation in the external auditory meatus or tympanic membrane[37,38]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Frequencies according to its width, thickness, and stiffness. The basal region responds to high-frequency sounds, while the apical region reacts to low-frequency sounds. Tanaka et al.[11] and Xu et al.[12] proposed a micro-cantilever array that mimics the mechanical performance of the BM Another parameter that can be varied to mimic the appropriate frequency selectivity is the membrane width of an ABM. The performance of CIs is acceptable, the requirement to wear an external processor that communicates with the implanted device via a radio-frequency coil increases the power consumption, limits the activities that can be undertaken while wearing the device, leads to some patients feeling stigmatized and contributes to the high cost of these devices[30,31,32,33] To overcome these limitations, researchers have attempted to develop a next-generation CI that integrated a microfabricated ABM8,9,15,16,25,33,34

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.