Abstract

SummaryThis paper proposes a methodology to benchmark satellite payload architectures and find the optimal trade‐offs between high flexibility and low complexity. High flexibility would enable the satellite to adapt to various distributions of user terminals on the ground and fulfill the data rate demand of these users. Besides, low complexity is required to keep satellite networks competitive in the context of emerging 5G networks. To estimate the flexibility of a payload, an indicator to characterize the non‐uniformity of user distributions is proposed. Each benchmarked payload may be characterized by a graph relating the throughput to this parameter further denoted . The payload provides the same throughput trends for different scenarios of user distributions with the same parameter. As a consequence, the average capacity of the system may be estimated by (a) calculating the probability distribution of over the orbit and (b) integrating the throughput based on this payload response. It thus results in a straightforward way for benchmarking payloads directly on an estimation of the averaged capacity, accounting for the user distribution over the earth. A simulation platform has been developed to characterize the payload throughput including the implementation of a resource allocation algorithm that accounts for constraints of various payloads. Using this definition and the developed tool, we benchmark a bent‐pipe architecture, a beam hopping architecture and a hybrid beam‐steering architecture for a LEO megaconstellation use case. The methodology showcases the interest for investigating different payload architectures depending on realistic traffic scenario analysis.

Highlights

  • SummaryThis paper proposes a methodology to benchmark satellite payload architectures and find the optimal trade-offs between high flexibility and low complexity

  • Traditional satellite telecommunication networks are based on GEO satellites and offer either mobile or fixed services that exploit the wide coverage offered by satellite platforms.[1]

  • All the payloads were designed to provide the same throughput on a uniform scenario with an aggregated demand of 30 Gbps, which is the maximum throughput targeted per satellite of the megaconstellation

Read more

Summary

Summary

This paper proposes a methodology to benchmark satellite payload architectures and find the optimal trade-offs between high flexibility and low complexity. The average capacity of the system may be estimated by (a) calculating the probability distribution of μ over the orbit and (b) integrating the throughput based on this payload response It results in a straightforward way for benchmarking payloads directly on an estimation of the averaged capacity, accounting for the user distribution over the earth. A simulation platform has been developed to characterize the payload throughput including the implementation of a resource allocation algorithm that accounts for constraints of various payloads. Using this definition and the developed tool, we benchmark a bent-pipe architecture, a beam hopping architecture and a hybrid beam-steering architecture for a LEO megaconstellation use case.

INTRODUCTION
ASSESSED PAYLOADS
Multiple fixed beam coverage with bent-pipe transponders
Multiple beam coverage with beam hopping transponders
Multiple beam coverage with steering capabilities along ones axis
PAYLOAD DESIGN
Radiation patterns
Antenna monitoring
Amplifiers
Distribution characterization of traffic scenarios
Description of the resource allocation algorithm
Architectures performance
Analysis on an orbit with a realistic traffic
Trade-off between satellite used capacity and payload complexity
CONCLUSION

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.