Abstract

Introduction Still too many deaths and injuries are a result of road safety limitations within Europe. Road safety measures aimed to change the road environment to reduce the risks on driver errors and to reduce the seriousness of the effects of driver errors are expected to increase road safety. A suitable combination of new technologies with existing infrastructure, or with limited improvements of it, may lead to much more cost-effective solutions (Brookhuis et al. 2006). The In-Safety project was aimed at determining which safety measures are expected to be most effective and in the project also evaluations were performed in pilot sites and modeling laboratories. Methods The methodological approach for the selection and prioritization of the initial set of safety measures is presented and discussed, based on an accident analysis. First, the general approach is described, then the method is presented including the definition of a scenario, how accident statistics are used as a starting point, the generation of safety measures, and the method of selection of safety measures. Finally, the AHP multicriteria analysis method, involved in the final prioritisation of the selected safety measures is presented briefly. Results and conclusion The methodology proves to be appropriate for generating and evaluating self explaining road environment measures and forgiving measures, but safety measures in the urban environment were underrepresented, due to stakeholders’ preferences.

Highlights

  • Still too many deaths and injuries are a result of road safety limitations within Europe

  • We investigated what possibilities there are for new combinations in infrastructure and in-vehicle systems in order to raise road safety

  • The results showed that, for the public authorities, preferred safety measures are characterised by minimal infrastructural investments, and “speeding measures” considered the most important

Read more

Summary

Methods

D. de Waard Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. G. Wenzel Institute for Human Factors and Technology Management (IAT), University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany. C. Macharis Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Vakgroep MOSI-Transport & Logistics, Brussels, Belgium presented and discussed, based on an accident analysis. The general approach is described, the method is presented including the definition of a scenario, how accident statistics are used as a starting point, the generation of safety measures, and the method of selection of safety measures. The AHP multicriteria analysis method, involved in the final prioritisation of the selected safety measures is presented briefly

Results and conclusion
Introduction
Research approach
Integration of the evaluation in the decisionmaking process
Definition of a scenario
Accident statistics
Safety measures generation
Evaluation of safety effects
Selection of 18 alternatives
Co-operative system measure
Estimation of potential of safety effects
Multiple criteria analysis
76 Level 1
Prioritisation of scenarios
Discussion and conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call