Abstract

Despite the large number of species distribution modelling (SDM) applications driven by tracking data, individual information is most of the time neglected and traditional SDM approaches commonly focus on predicting the potential distribution at the species or population‐level. By running classical SDMs (population approach) with mixed models including a random factor to account for the variability attributable to individual (individual approach), we propose an innovative five‐steps framework to predict the potential and individual‐level distributions of mobile species using GPS data collected from green turtles. Pseudo‐absences were randomly generated following an environmentally‐stratified procedure. A negative exponential dispersal kernel was incorporated into the individual model to account for spatial fidelity, while five environmental variables derived from high‐resolution Lidar and hyperspectral data were used as predictors of the species distribution in generalized linear models. Both approaches showed a strong predictive power (mean: AUC > 0.93, CBI > 0.88) and goodness‐of‐fit (0.6 < adjusted R2 < 0.9), but differed geographically with favorable habitats restricted around the tagging locations for the individual approach whereas favorable habitats from the population approach were more widespread. Our innovative way to combine predictions from both approaches into a single map provides a unique scientific baseline to support conservation planning and management of many taxa. Our framework is easy to implement and brings new opportunities to exploit existing tracking dataset, while addressing key ecological questions such as inter‐individual plasticity and social interactions.

Highlights

  • Over the past two decades, the need to quantify species distribution inspired the development of various mechanistic and correlative tools known as species distribution models (SDMs) which are available to ecologists interested in predicting species distribution

  • To provide a full picture of the potential and realized distributions of mobile species, we propose here a 5-step species distribution modelling framework based on tracking data

  • Despite its very good values (CBI > 0.6, positive values indicate a model which predictions are consistent with the distribution of presences in the evaluation dataset), the CBI showed some variability for the Individual model (CBI range: 0.67–0.99)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Over the past two decades, the need to quantify species distribution inspired the development of various mechanistic (i.e. process-based) and correlative tools known as species distribution models (SDMs) which are available to ecologists interested in predicting species distribution. Correlative species distribution models (SDMs), grounded in ecological niche theory (Hutchinson 1957), are statistical tools commonly used to predict suitable habitats of a species based on the statistical relationship between its occurrence and its environment (Austin 2002, Elith and Leathwick 2009). In contrast to correlative models, mechanistic SDMs use physiological information about a species to determine the range of environmental conditions within which the species can persist (Kearney and Porter 2009). Correlative SDMs have been more largely used across terrestrial, freshwater and marine realms compared to mechanistic models

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.