Abstract

Wearable sensor technology has enabled unobtrusive monitoring of arm movements of stroke survivors in the home environment. However, the most widely established method, based on activity counts, provides quantitative rather than qualitative information on arm without functional insights, and is sensitive to passive arm movements during ambulatory activities. We propose a method to quantify functionally relevant arm use in stroke survivors relying on a single wrist-worn inertial measurement unit. Orientation of the forearm during movements is measured in order identify gross arm movements. The method is validated in 10 subacute/chronic stroke survivors wearing inertial sensors at 5 anatomical locations for 48 h. Measurements are compared to conventional activity counts and to a test for gross manual dexterity. Duration of gross arm movements of the paretic arm correlated significantly better with the Box and Block Test (r=0.95) than conventional activity counts when walking phases were included (r=0.69), and similar results were found when comparing ratios of paretic and non-paretic arms for gross movements and activity counts. The proposed gross arm movement metric is robust against passive arm movements during ambulatory activities and requires only a single-sensor module placed at the paretic wrist for the assessment of functionally relevant arm use.

Highlights

  • Functional recovery and regain of independence following neurological injury are commonly assessed via clinical scores, comprising capacity and time measures, and subjective questionnaires [11]

  • The distributions of paretic and non-paretic forearm elevation differed in a subject with a low Box and Block Test (BBT) score of 6, with the mean of the paretic forearm displaying a lower elevation during activity

  • We conclude that GM measured with one 6-DOF inertial measurement units (IMUs) worn at the paretic wrist qualifies as assessment of functional arm use in real life

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Functional recovery and regain of independence following neurological injury are commonly assessed via clinical scores, comprising capacity and time measures, and subjective questionnaires [11]. Objective information on arm use in the home environment could provide a valuable complement to insights gained from clinical assessments. Activity counts (AC) derived from the acceleration signals provide quantitative information about arm activity, such as total duration [27, 28] and intensity of movements [5, 23]. AC provide only information about the amount of arm use but not about functional arm use. To reject the influence of ambulatory activities, the ratio of arm use between paretic and non-paretic arm is commonly used [2, 26, 28,29,30]. Ratios are a relative measure of intensity or duration of use and are not suitable to capture potential changes in absolute activity or use

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call