Abstract

To account for spatial displacement errors common in quantitative precipitation forecasts (QPFs), a method using systematic shifting of QPF fields was tested to create ensemble streamflow forecasts. While previous studies addressed spatial displacement using neighborhood approaches, shifting of QPF accounts for those errors while maintaining the structure of predicted systems, a feature important in hydrologic forecasts. QPFs from the nine-member High-Resolution Rapid Refresh Ensemble were analyzed for 46 forecasts from 6 cases covering 17 basins within the National Weather Service North Central River Forecast Center forecasting region. Shifts of 55.5 and 111 km were made in the four cardinal and intermediate directions, increasing the ensemble size to 81 members. These members were input into a distributed hydrologic model to create an ensemble streamflow prediction. Overall, the ensemble using the shifted QPFs had an improved frequency of non-exceedance and probability of detection, and thus better predicted flood occurrence. However, false alarm ratio did not improve, likely because shifting multiple QPF ensembles increases the potential to place heavy precipitation in a basin where none actually occurred. A weighting scheme based on a climatology of displacements was tested, improving overall performance slightly compared to the approach using non-weighted members.

Highlights

  • High-intensity rainfall, which frequently occurs in the U.S Upper Midwest during the warm season (March–September), often causes flooding, with extensive socioeconomic impacts

  • Evaluation and Verification important to understand if general errors exist in the magnitude of the rain events predicted, the present study focuses methods to account spatialstreamflow errors in quantitative precipitation forecasts (QPFs), it is important since large underor over-estimates of on amount would preventfor accurate forecasts, even if to understand if general errorsThus, exist errors in theinmagnitude of the rain events predicted, since large the location is predicted perfectly

  • To understand the role that QPF magnitude errors might play in the results, the High-Resolution Rapid Refresh Ensemble (HRRRE) QPF

Read more

Summary

Introduction

High-intensity rainfall, which frequently occurs in the U.S Upper Midwest during the warm season (March–September), often causes flooding, with extensive socioeconomic impacts. Providing more accurate and timely streamflow forecasts to decision makers is important for mitigating some of the impacts caused by flooding. Operational streamflow forecasts typically are made using quantitative precipitation estimates (i.e., QPE) [3,4,5], which are not available until the precipitation occurs, providing little lead time for emergency management. Enhancements in technology and computing resources have improved the ability to predict convective precipitation; large uncertainties in forecasting the location, timing, and intensity of such rainfall remain [9,10,11,12]. Upgrades to convection-allowing models, which have high enough resolution to explicitly resolve convection, such as the High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) model, have improved biases for intense precipitation; Water 2020, 12, 3505; doi:10.3390/w12123505 www.mdpi.com/journal/water

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call