Abstract

The majority of data on human Natural Killer (NK) cell phenotype and function has been generated using cryopreserved peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). However, cryopreservation can have adverse effects on PBMCs. In contrast, investigating immune cells in whole blood can reduce the time, volume of blood required, and potential artefacts associated with manipulation of the cells. Whole blood collected from healthy donors and cancer patients was processed by three separate protocols that can be used independently or in parallel to assess extracellular receptors, intracellular signaling protein phosphorylation, and intracellular and extracellular cytokine production in human NK cells. To assess extracellular receptor expression, 200 μL of whole blood was incubated with an extracellular staining (ECS) mix and cells were subsequently fixed and RBCs lysed prior to analysis. The phosphorylation status of signaling proteins was assessed in 500 μL of whole blood following co-incubation with interleukin (IL)-2/12 and an ECS mix for 20 min prior to cell fixation, RBC lysis, and subsequent permeabilization for staining with an intracellular staining (ICS) mix. Cytokine production (IFNγ) was similarly assessed by incubating 1 mL of whole blood with PMA-ionomycin or IL-2/12 prior to incubation with ECS and subsequent ICS antibodies. In addition, plasma was collected from stimulated samples prior to ECS for quantification of secreted IFNγ by ELISA. Results were consistent, despite inherent inter-patient variability. Although we did not investigate an exhaustive list of targets, this approach enabled quantification of representative ECS surface markers including activating (NKG2D and DNAM-1) and inhibitory (NKG2A, PD-1, TIGIT, and TIM-3) receptors, cytokine receptors (CD25, CD122, CD132, and CD212) and ICS markers associated with NK cell activation following stimulation, including signaling protein phosphorylation (p-STAT4, p-STAT5, p-p38 MAPK, p-S6) and IFNγ in both healthy donors and cancer patients. In addition, we compared extracellular receptor expression using whole blood vs. cryopreserved PBMCs and observed a significant difference in the expression of almost all receptors. The methods presented permit a relatively rapid parallel assessment of immune cell receptor expression, signaling protein activity, and cytokine production in a minimal volume of whole blood from both healthy donors and cancer patients.

Highlights

  • Natural Killer (NK) cells, first identified by Kiessling et al in 1975, are cytotoxic lymphocytes that play a critical role in the innate immune response through the destruction of stressed, infected, or cancerous cells [1]

  • The workflow of some immune cell studies may be more compatible with protocols utilizing cryopreserved samples, for example multi-institute studies, due to the advantages reported here we suggest that some assays may be significantly improved through the implementation of whole blood protocols

  • These assays circumvent the limitations associated with the use of cryopreserved peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), namely manipulation of cells and the thawing process which may alter cell phenotype and function

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Natural Killer (NK) cells, first identified by Kiessling et al in 1975, are cytotoxic lymphocytes that play a critical role in the innate immune response through the destruction of stressed, infected, or cancerous cells [1]. We developed protocols that can be used in parallel to assess the phenotype, intracellular signaling following cytokine stimulation, and cytokine production of immune cells, and as an example, in this paper we highlight its implementation for our ongoing research investigating NK cells in cancer patients. Investigating protein phosphorylation states by flow cytometry is difficult in cryopreserved samples due to the poor signal to noise ratio of the target protein compared to investigations in whole blood samples [27] Many of these limitations can be overcome by staining directly in whole blood, which allows for simpler and faster protocols that require minimal manipulation of the cells of interest and support the biological relevance of the results.

METHODS
Objective
RESULTS
LIMITATIONS
DISCUSSION
ETHICS STATEMENT
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call