Abstract
ABSTRACT We present a novel method for the critical analysis of professional scientists’ communications with the public. The method blends Entman’s (2007) [Framing bias: Media in the distribution of power. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 163–173)] framing theory and van Leeuwen’s (1996) [The representation of social actors. In C. R. Caldas-Coulthard, & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and practices readings in critical discourse analysis (pp. 32–104). Routledge] sociosemantic analysis to distill the relationship between written texts and larger political discourses circulating in society. We demonstrate our novel method by comparing two articles from a popular science publication, both of which discuss issues of gender equity in the professional STEM community. We close by discussing the affordances and limitations of our novel method and offering possible extensions of our method for future research.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Science Education, Part B
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
