A Method for More Accurate Determination of Resonance Frequency of the Cardiovascular System, and Evaluation of a Program to Perform It.

Abstract

This study validated a more exact automated method of determining cardiovascular resonance frequency (RF) against the "stepped" protocol described by Lehrer et al. (Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 25(3):177-191, https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009554825745 , 2000; in Foundations of heart rate variability biofeedback: A book of readings, The Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, pp 9-19, 2016). Thirteen participants completed a 15-min RF determination session by each method.The "stepped" protocol assesses HRV in five 3-min stationary windows from 4.5 to 6.5 breaths per minute (bpm), decreasing in 0.5bpm steps. Multiple criteria, subjectively weighted by the clinician, determines RF. For this study, the proposed method used a sliding window with a fixed rate of change (67.04ms per breath) at each of 78 breath cycles ranging from 4.25 to 6.75bpm. Its algorithm analyzes IBI to locate the midpoint of the 1-min region of stable maximum peak-trough variability. RF is quantified from breath duration at that point. The software generates a visual display of superimposed HR and breathing data. Thus, the new method fully automates RF determination. Eleven of the 13 matched pairs fell within the 0.5bpm resolution of the stepped method. Comparisons of LF power generated by the autoregressive (AR) spectral method showed a strong correlation in LF power production by the stepped and sliding methods (R = 0.751, p = 0.000). The "sliding" pacing protocol was favored by 69% of participants (p < 0.02). The new, fully-automated, method may facilitate both in-person and remote HRV biofeedback training. Software is available open-source.