Abstract
Evaluation of artistry mostly depends on subjective perceptions of experts. As a decision-making process, it involves imprecision and fuzziness, and it is difficult to justify the process. Most art programs’ admission process involves evaluation of the candidates’ pencil drawings and selecting students among competing candidates. Using a justifiable process is essential for the administrators of art programs. Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making methods provide convincing results for real-world problems involving imprecise and fuzzy data. In this study, a modified version of the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and TOPSIS methods are proposed for the art student placement process. Delphi technique is used for identifying the evaluation criteria and the FAHP method is used in obtaining the importance of criteria. Rankings of the candidate students are determined using the TOPSIS method. The resulting rank order of drawings is evaluated by the committee members for validating the performance of the proposed method.
Highlights
In studies Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) model, a questionnaire asking to evaluate the place of where the MCDM method is applied, the satisfaction of the ranking of the given drawings in Table 10 is administered decision-makers from the results of the MCDM models are not to the six committee members
In this study, capturing and identifying experts’ decision problems when subjectivity/perceptivity plays an decision criteria is a crucial stage in fully understanding the important role in implicit evaluation decisions as it does in the decision making process in artwork evaluation
Since subjectivity plays an important role in decision since they are not used to working with mathematical models. making in these types of decision-making problems, measuring For this purpose, individual interviews are conducted with the acceptance of the method’s results by the decision-making experts to create a list of criteria
Summary
Since the evaluation of art is subjective/perceptive and (2006: 60) defines art and art thought in school as “weak involves individual judgment shaped by the individual’s past knowledge structures made up of series of non-comparable experiences and art education, the determination of evaluation paradigms or languages or approaches.” Even though this criteria needs to be an integral part of the proposed method. Since the evaluation of art is subjective/perceptive and (2006: 60) defines art and art thought in school as “weak involves individual judgment shaped by the individual’s past knowledge structures made up of series of non-comparable experiences and art education, the determination of evaluation paradigms or languages or approaches.”. Even though this criteria needs to be an integral part of the proposed method. Nodine, Locher, and Krupinski (1993) an important task For this purpose, The Delphi method studied the relationship between the perception of art and introduced by Linstone and Turoff (1975) stands out as the training.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary 
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Business and Applied Social Science
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
