A meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors as treatments for metastatic bladder cancer.

Abstract

BackgroundThis article is a meta-analysis aiming to systematically assess the efficacy and safety profiles of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with advanced or metastatic bladder cancer.MethodsWe extracted and examined data from phase I, II, and III clinical trials from the Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, which included patients with metastatic bladder cancer who were treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. We performed a meta-analysis to investigate several indexes of efficacy and safety, including the objective response rate (ORR), 1-year overall survival (OS) rate, 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate, and adverse event (AE) rate of immune checkpoint inhibitors. The material data were calculated and pooled using The R Project for Statistical Computing and Review Manager 5.3.ResultsAfter excluding ineligible records, 14 clinical trials were included in our analysis. The pooled frequencies of all-grade AEs and grade ≥3 AEs were 0.63 (95% CI 0.61–0.65, P=0.34) and 0.14 (95% CI 0.11–0.17, P=0.0072), respectively. The summary ORR was 0.21 (95% CI 0.18–0.24 P=0.07), and the 1-year OS and 1-year PFS rates were 0.48 (95% CI 0.42–0.54 P=0.0013) and 0.21 (95% CI 0.16–0.26 P=0.04), respectively. The OR of ORR between the PD-L1-positive and -negative groups was 3.09 (95% CI 2.01–4.75, P=0.08).ConclusionThe PD-1/PD-L1 therapy showed appropriate efficacy and acceptable incidence of treatment-related AEs. In addition, the level of discrimination of PD-L1 expression might be related to the effect of the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, and patients displaying positive expression might experience a better curative effect than patients displaying negative expression.