A meta-analysis of Lateral supraorbital vs mini Pterional approach in the outcome of rupture and unruptured noncomplex aneurysms’ surgery

Abstract

To determine the characteristics and to compare the functional outcomes and safety of different subfrontal approaches versus mini Pterional (MPT) approaches mainly for the treatment of ruptured noncomplex intracranial aneurysms. This meta-analysis included articles comparing outcomes of brain aneurysms (BAs) – most for the anterior circulation–, using Lateral supraorbital & Supraorbital keyhole (LSO) versus MPT approach. There were six articles left into the final article pool and the total number of patients was 683 (322 in LSO and 361 in the MPT group). In terms of the early and late time of surgery, the LSO seems to be superior over the MPT approach but with heterogeneity (OR −0.21, CI 95% −0.59 to 0.18, and p=0.04) or (OR −0.21, CI 95% −0.69 to 0.28, and p=0.05), and (p=0.02 and I2=68.97%) or (p=0.05 and I2=61.74%) respectively. Regarding the subgroup of patients with the supra-early time of surgery, surgical duration, completed occlusion, technical intraoperative complications, postoperative infection, intraoperative rupture, vasospasm, good and poor neurological outcomes and clinical deterioration, there was no superiority of the one method over the other. Mini or keyhole craniotomy even challenging might be a good option for neurosurgeons. Particularly in ruptured noncomplex aneurysms’ surgery LSO seems to be superior over the MPT approach in terms of the early time and in the late time of surgery but with heterogeneity.