Abstract

Abstract This investigation reviewed 59 studies examining the utility of the Frostig Developmental Test of Visual Perception and the efficacy of the Frostig program for the development of visual perception. Meta‐analysis, statistical procedures for accumulating evidence, was the method used to evaluate research findings relating to both test and program. Findings indicated that neither the Frostig test nor the Frostig training program were advantageous. The Frostig test did not demonstrate sufficient association with reading ability to be a useful predictor; it proved less useful than other visual perceptual measures and revealed a large common variance with intelligence. Findings assessing the efficacy of Frostig training showed that it is not an effective intervention for improving either visual perceptual skills assessed by the test or academic achievement. It is concluded that the available research has demonstrated that the Frostig materials are not successful and should be questioned as primary meth...

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.