Abstract
AbstractSchool quality capitalization studies report widely mixed results. This article conducts meta‐analysis to identify the data characteristics and research methods that explain this variation. The way the school quality is measured matters but no single measure clearly dominates. Both boundary and neighborhood fixed effects significantly control for the influence of neighborhood amenities. Increasing the number of quality variables reduces the capitalization significance of each. Regional differences also appear to matter; studies using data drawn from the South exhibit weaker capitalization. Also, it is surprising that econometric methods do not appear to be driving results.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
