Abstract
The dual entitlement principle suggests that price change motives influence price fairness perceptions. A meta-analysis replicates this finding, and shows that the negative effect of unjustified motives is stronger than the positive effect of cost-justified motives; motive effects are independent of the magnitude of the price change; and price fairness is explained better by price changes than by motives. The relationship between price change and price fairness follows a cubic function, indicating satiation effects for high price changes.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
