Abstract

This systematic review assessed the effectiveness of ozone (O3) in the color change of in-office tooth bleaching in vital teeth (TB) and the sensitivity control. Only randomized controlled clinical trials were included. Seven databases were used as primary search sources, and three additional sources were searched to capture the "grey literature" partially. The JBI tool was used to assess the risk of bias. TB was assessed using the ΔELab color change metric comparing tooth color pre- and post-bleaching. We meta-analyzed the ΔELab estimates per method and calculated the absolute standardized mean difference using random-effect models. The GRADE approach assessed the certainty of the evidence. The ΔELab estimates ranged from 1.28 when the O3 was used alone to 6.93 when combined with hydrogen peroxide (HP). Two studies compared O3 and HP alone, but their TB was similar (SMD = − 0.02; 95%CI: − 0.54; 0.49). The bleaching effectiveness for the combination of O3 + HP compared to HP was similar (SMD = 0.38; 95%CI: − 0.04; 0.81). Thus, based on the available literature, our findings suggest that O3 is not superior to the conventional technique using HP on the change of tooth color. The O3 did not present sensitivity when used alone. When O3 was used in combination with HP, patients reported hypersensitivity only when O3 was applied before HP, i.e., no sensitivity was perceived when O3 was applied after HP.

Highlights

  • This study aimed to assess the effect of ­O3 on color change in tooth bleaching alone and combined with the HPbased bleaching gel, and reduction of tooth sensitivity from the bleaching process in vital teeth

  • All the studies included in this review reported color change perceptible to the human eye (1.28—1.66)[32] or acceptable (3.08—6.93)[28,29,30] for teeth compared before and after the bleaching therapy

  • Tooth sensitivity is a major clinical factor that should be considered during and after tooth bleaching, as current studies show that medications used to reduce this painful symptomatology are not e­ ffective[3,7,49,50,51]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A meta-analysis with a random-effects model was performed using the Stata 16.0 software (StataCorp., College Station, TX, USA). The ΔELab estimates from the different methods were compared by absolute standardized mean differences (SMD) to compare the bleaching effectiveness. We did not meta-analyzed the VAS measures since only one ­study[28] would be eligible, since the remaining ­studies[29,30] did not show any variability on the VAS scale comparing comparing the pre- and post-bleaching periods

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call