Abstract
Eighteen studies reporting Halstead-Reitan (HR) Neuropsychological Battery test performances for over 1000 non-brain damaged subjects were reviewed. Substantial empirical normative data is available only for a group of middle-aged adults characterized by relatively high intelligence and education. Serious methodological flaws in Halstead's original work, changes in the administration of HR Battery over the years, as well as variations in subsequent normative data suggest the traditional Halstead cutting scores are inappropriate. Norms for a composite “meta-sample” were reported. Noting that the HR test scores are valid concommitants of neuropsychological dysfunction, specific areas needing empirical elucidation are outlined.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
