Abstract

SummaryRed blood cell distribution width (RCDW) and mean corpuscular volume (MCV) are associated with different risk factors for hemorrhagic stroke. However, whether RCDW and MCV are causally related to hemorrhagic stroke remains poorly understood. Therefore, we explored the causality between RCDW/MCV and nontraumatic hemorrhagic strokes using Mendelian randomization (MR) methods. We extracted exposure and outcome summary statistics from the UK Biobank and FinnGen. We evaluated the causality of RCDW/MCV on four outcomes (subarachnoid hemorrhage [SAH], intracerebral hemorrhage [ICH], nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage [nITH], and a combination of SAH, cerebral aneurysm, and aneurysm operations) using univariable MR (UMR) and multivariable MR (MVMR). We further performed colocalization and mediation analyses. UMR and MVMR revealed that higher genetically predicted MCV is protective of ICH (UMR: odds ratio [OR] = 0.89 [0.8–0.99], p = 0.036; MVMR: OR = 0.87 [0.78–0.98], p = 0.021) and nITH (UMR: OR = 0.89 [0.82–0.97], p = 0.005; MVMR: OR = 0.88 [0.8–0.96], p = 0.004). There were no strong causal associations between RCDW/MCV and any other outcome. Colocalization analysis revealed a shared causal variant between MCV and ICH; it was not reported to be associated with ICH. Proportion mediated via diastolic blood pressure was 3.1% (0.1%,14.3%) in ICH and 3.4% (0.2%,15.8%) in nITH. The study constitutes the first MR analysis on whether genetically elevated RCDW and MCV affect the risk of hemorrhagic strokes. UMR, MVMR, and mediation analysis revealed that MCV is a protective factor for ICH and nITH, which may inform new insights into the treatments for hemorrhagic strokes.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.