Abstract
Studies of post-disturbance recovery in alluvial channels have considered form- and/or process-based paradigms to describe pathways to dynamic equilibrium. Yet, an integrated understanding of the covariation between form and process as well as the mechanisms that drive the recovery of each remains incomplete. We used a small (4 m tall) upland dam removal in New England as a natural experiment to investigate the timing and arc of a channel's return to dynamic equilibrium conditions, using both form- and process-based perspectives. We observed rapid post-removal adjustments in the former reservoir and downstream channels, then relative stability after a 2-year flow that occurred 6 months post-removal. This pattern, previously described as the “two-phase” model of channel recovery, was the result of temporal variations in the ratio of Shields values at the ‘bankfull’ flow (θQ2) to critical Shields (θcr). Immediately post-dam removal, elevated sediment flux was driven by the high ratio of θQ2 to θcr that resulted from decreased θcr values and elevated θQ2 values. As fine-grained sediments were winnowed, θcr quickly recovered back to typical values within weeks to months. Subsequent adjustments to channel geometry by higher flows (i.e., the 2-year flow) redistributed bed shear stress and facilitated the relaxation of θQ2 so that θQ2: θcr ≈ 1, the threshold channel criterion. Despite the rapid return to process-based equilibrium, nearly 3 years post-removal the former reservoir reach remains morphologically immature with respect to reach-scale characteristics of natural channels. Our results indicate that process-based recovery is rapid, facilitated by relatively frequent, modest flows, and dependent on the adjustment of the characteristic bed grain size (d50) to reflect prevailing hydraulics. In contrast, the slower attainment of form-based equilibrium depends on the timing of less frequent flows equal to and/or larger than the bankfull discharge as well as extrinsic channel controls such as local valley topography and the availability of recruitable large wood.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.