Abstract
There are significant knowledge gaps about the responses of submerged aquatic macrophytes to CO 2 enrichment and global warming. A mechanistic steady-state photosynthesis model for submerged aquatic macrophytes was developed to provide an analysis tool to investigate the responses of plant photosynthesis to CO 2, temperature and light. The model was based upon a general simplified scheme for inorganic carbon assimilation of submerged aquatic macrophytes which integrated the knowledge about aquatic plant photosynthesis from previous research, mainly on Hydrilla. The model includes: (1) diffusion and/or active transfer of inorganic carbon (CO 2 and/or HCO − 3) in the bathing medium into the leaf mesophyll and cytosol; (2) diffusion and/or ‘pumping’ of CO 2 through the PEPcase-related C 4 pathway into the chloroplast; (3) inter-conversions between CO 2 and HCO − 3 inside cells; (4) photosynthetic carbon reduction cycle (PCR) in the chloroplast. In the model, the PCR processes in the chloroplast were described using the widely accepted C 3 photosynthesis model. The activity of the C 4 cycle was related to environmental CO 2 ‘stress’. In this way, the model can simulate the shift between C 3-like and C 4-like photosynthesis under different environmental conditions. The model was validated using gas exchange data from Hydrilla plants grown in ambient and elevated CO 2. The model predicted quite well photosynthetic responses to incident PAR, temperature and ambient CO 2 for both ambient and elevated atmospheric CO 2 treatments. Model predictions agreed well with measured Hydrilla gas exchange data. The simulated and measured CO 2 compensation points of Hydrilla leaf photosynthesis were about 100 ppm. The light compensation point of photosynthesis was about 25 μ mol m −2 s −1 (PAR), and photosynthesis rate was saturated at about 100 μ mol m −2 s −1 (PAR). Higher pH slightly increased photosynthesis rates at ambient CO 2 (∼350 ppm). There was no significant acclimation of Hydrilla photosynthesis to elevated CO 2 within the experimental period. Simulated CO 2 compensation point decreased with increasing activity of C 4-cycle processes.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.