Abstract

Phantoms are essentially required to generate boundary data for studying the inverse solver performance in electrical impedance tomography (EIT). A MATLAB-based boundary data simulator (BDS) is developed to generate accurate boundary data using neighbouring current pattern for assessing the EIT inverse solvers. Domain diameter, inhomogeneity number, inhomogeneity geometry (shape, size, and position), background conductivity, and inhomogeneity conductivity are all set as BDS input variables. Different sets of boundary data are generated by changing the input variables of the BDS, and resistivity images are reconstructed using electrical impedance tomography and diffuse optical tomography reconstruction software (EIDORS). Results show that the BDS generates accurate boundary data for different types of single or multiple objects which are efficient enough to reconstruct the resistivity images for assessing the inverse solver. It is noticed that for the BDS with 2048 elements, the boundary data for all inhomogeneities with a diameter larger than 13.3% of that of the phantom are accurate enough to reconstruct the resistivity images in EIDORS-2D. By comparing the reconstructed image with an original geometry made in BDS, it would be easier to study the inverse solver performance and the origin of the boundary data error can be identified.

Highlights

  • Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) [1, 2] reconstructs the spatial distribution of electrical conductivity or resistivity of a closed conducting domain (Ω) from the surface potentials developed by a constant current injection through the surface electrodes surrounding the domain to be imaged

  • boundary data simulator (BDS) is developed with four parts: imaging domain simulator (IDS), EIT model developer (EMD), current injection simulator (CIS), and boundary data calculator (BDC)

  • Imaging domain simulator (IDS) simulates a domain with single or multiple inhomogeneities of different geometries defined with their corresponding conductivity distributions, whereas the EIT model developer (EMD) derives a forward model using finite element method (FEM) to solve the governing equation of the domain under test (DUT)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) [1, 2] reconstructs the spatial distribution of electrical conductivity or resistivity of a closed conducting domain (Ω) from the surface potentials developed by a constant current injection through the surface electrodes surrounding the domain to be imaged. Practical phantoms containing electrolyte (or other conducting medium) [4,5,6,7,8,9,10] are three-dimensional in shape and they will have some data error due to the three dimensional current conduction. Network or mesh phantoms [12, 13] are compact, more stable, rugged, portable, easy to move, consistent over time, and less temperature dependent. These phantoms need a huge number of identical electronic components properly designed in a mesh mimicking the conductivity distribution of a practical biological tissue. For a large tissue structure, a mesh phantom requires a huge number

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call